Bring CISO strategy, Cyber GRC and operational governance together through one continuously managed service combining expert CISO oversight with structured governance management and executive reporting.
CISO Office & Strategy
Cyber GRC & Assurance
Cyber Operations & Intelligence
Cyber governance solutions designed around your business challenges, regulatory obligations and industry requirements.
Cyber Governance Solutions
Public & Regulated
Industrial
Commercial
Browse resources to help you stay informed on the latest insights, events, and updates.
Insights & Intelligence
Regulations & Standards
CISO GenNext
Academy & Certifications
Customer Evidence
Events
Learn about ZelarTrust, our leadership, cybersecurity expertise, credentials and commitment to trusted cyber governance.
Company
Platform
Solutions
Resources
Audits arrive on a schedule. Evidence usually does not. The cost of that gap is paid in the weeks before every assessment.
Is control evidence being produced as the controls operate, rather than assembled before an assessment?
Yes. Last collection 4 hours ago; 3 controls flagged for re-test ahead of the next assessment window.
Evidence is collected retrospectively, by asking people for screenshots of a state that has already changed.
Findings from the last assessment are still open when the next one starts.
Control effectiveness is asserted from documentation rather than tested in practice.
The team knows the audit will be passed, but nobody can demonstrate readiness on any given day between audits.
Evidence produced as a by-product of operating the controls, not as a separate exercise before an assessment.
Findings tracked to closure with owners and dates, so remediation is a programme rather than a backlog.
Control effectiveness assessed on a schedule, with the gaps understood before an assessor finds them.
A defensible position on readiness at any point in the year, not only at audit time.
Step 1
Gap and maturity assessment against the frameworks in scope
Step 2
Control testing and effectiveness review
Step 3
Evidence governance — what is collected, by whom, how often, and where it lives
Step 4
Remediation planning and tracking to closure
Step 5
Audit preparation, walkthrough rehearsal and assessor liaison
The obligations this solution is built to govern. Wider coverage sits on the Platform pages.
The engagement closes the gap that exists today. CISOaaS keeps it closed — running assurance activity on a cadence, maintaining evidence as systems change, and carrying remediation through to closure rather than to the next assessment.
This solution addresses the problem. These are the Platform services that run it as a programme.
Address this requirement as a focused engagement, or fold it into the continuous CISOaaS programme that keeps it running afterwards.
